This article from Cato says something I've been thinking about ever since I started reading Reason.com's site. He demonstrates how two of my interests are really compatible even though some people don't think they are. :-)
I also think that Open Source (the system of development) which commonly produces Free Software is in itself a market response. Software is a pretty unique product, and in many cases traditional companies were not providing the customer with what they wanted. Things like mail servers, web servers, and operating systems have to work well after the marketing presentation. Sysadmins, programmers and other folks just got sick of flaky junk and built replacements... they became both provider and customer. That and a continuous non-marketing and non-deadline driven development cycle is good for infrastructure type software.
A lot of the OSS environment is built around the quality versus flashiness argument. I have a feeling that it's a response to the previous environment. The Free Software licenses give OSS development a leg to stand on and quality can flourish.
© Copyright 2009-2011 John Mulligan
Every blog page or article on this site is available under the CC-BY-SA license unless otherwise noted.